IAF seeks commitment from fighter vendors, will issue tenders only to those willing to transfer technology - Broadsword by Ajai Shukla - Strategy. Economics. Defence.

Home Top Ad


Sunday 8 April 2018

IAF seeks commitment from fighter vendors, will issue tenders only to those willing to transfer technology

Unprecedentedly detailed RFI describes operational requirement, rather than flying performance

By Ajai Shukla
Business Standard, 9th April 18

Global aerospace manufacturers with huge stakes in India’s proposed procurement of hundreds of fighter aircraft, are struck by the level of detail the Indian Air Force (IAF) has sought in a Request for Information (RFI) issued on Friday.

The 72-page RFI, besides specifying the IAF’s requirement in minute detail, seeks a clear commitment from vendors of their willingness to supply sensitive technologies, documentation, training facilities and performance guarantees.

The level of detail in the current RFI contrasts starkly with the sketchy, one-page RFI issued in 2004 in the ultimately aborted contest to supply the IAF with 126 medium multi-role combat aircraft (MMRCA).

Last October, the IAF issued an even shorter, one-paragraph RFI, soliciting interest in supplying the IAF with 100-200 single-engine fighters.

“The latest RFI seeks to avoid the mistakes of previous procurements, especially the MMRCA tender. In those vendors were not pinned down to clear commitments about transferring technology. This time, the commitments demanded ensure that non-serious vendors would be eliminated at the RFI stage itself. Unwilling vendors may not even be issued an RFP (request for proposals), points out Air Marshal Nirdosh Tyagi, who managed the MMRCA procurement for several years.

The RFP is a formal tender that is issued to vendors whose response to the RFI meets the military’s key requirements. It will be issued after detailed scrutiny of vendor responses to the RFI, which must be submitted by July 6.

IAF sources hope the RFP would be issued by this year-end, but admit that the defence ministry’s track record makes this an optimistic time frame. In the MMRCA procurement, the RFI was issued in 2004; and the RFP eventually in 2007.

Another key difference from previous tenders is the RFI’s focus on the operational capabilities the IAF requires – incorporating details of “air superiority” missions that must be carried out at 6 kilometres (20,000 feet) altitude, Lo-Lo-Lo ground strike (ingress, strike and egress at a low altitude of 150 metres), anti-shipping strikes, and others. In the MMRCA tender, much of the emphasis was on flight performance, such as turning radius, climb rate, sustained turn rate, etc.

This time, the aircraft is treated as a combat platform, not just a pure flying machine. The RFI enquires into operational ability, such as the time needed for a fully-armed and fuelled fighter to climb, using full afterburners, to an altitude of 3 kilometres and separately to 10 km altitude. This would indicate to IAF evaluators a fighter’s ability to position itself dominatingly against rapidly approaching enemy fighters.

The October RFI, which specified “single-engine” fighters, effectively reduced the contest to two aerospace vendors – Lockheed Martin and Saab – since they were the only companies with high-performance, single engine aircraft: the F-16 Block 70 and Gripen E respectively.

However, the current RFI opens the doors to four more vendors with twin-engine fighters on offer. These include Boeing (F/A-18E/F Super Hornet), Russian Aircraft Corporation (MiG-35), Eurofighter GmbH (Typhoon) and Dassault, which is already executing a contract for 36 Rafale fighters, signed in June 2016.

A key gainer is Boeing, which is already well placed in the navy’s acquisition of 57 carrier-borne multi-role fighters. Boeing India’s chief, Pratyush Kumar, noting that the inclusion of twin-engine fighters would “make room for vigorous competition”, also welcomed the emphasis on “specific operational capabilities rather than over-specifying technical parameters [of the fighter].

So too is Dassault, with the IAF already having ordered 36 of its Rafale fighters. The company, which sees itself in pole position in the contest, declined to comment.

Eurofighter GmbH is another possible gainer, with the Typhoon fighter back in the fray. Along with the Rafale, the Typhoon was the only other aircraft to clear the MMRCA flight trails. However, Airbus, which owns a 46 per cent stake in Eurofighter (BAE Systems owns 33 per cent and Leonardo owns the remaining 21 per cent) stated only that it would examine the RFI.

Surprisingly, Lockheed Martin, which now faces enlarged competition, is the most upbeat of the vendors. Welcoming the RFI, the company states: “The F-16, including its unmatched export opportunities, remains the only aircraft program in this competition with the proven performance and industrial scale to meet India’s operational needs and Make in India priorities.”

Saab, a Swedish aerospace company, which similarly finds a two-horse field now expanded to 5-6, has reserved comment until it analyses the RFI. “We believe Gripen is the best choice for India and that Gripen will satisfy the Indian needs in the best possible way”, says a statement from Saab.


  1. While we analyse the New RFP the Chinese will mass produce the J22 and park a few in Sarghodha.

    Kabul is also willing to join one road economic corridor

  2. Another hogwash by the govt. Nothing's coming. Another 7-8 year drama which will get scrapped. The rate at which Indian govts scrap such rfps isn't even funny. This is just a way to tell the masses that theyre doing something to address the shortfall of fighters. In Reality...no money and no intention!

    It's a joke!

  3. Lockheed Martin F16 is the best of the outdated bunch as far as assembling in India is concerned . Why is India not considering buying the F35, it’s not much more expensive? Have the Americans offered it to India? I am sure Indian Diplomacy will can obtain the F35 from the Americans for purchase.
    In 15 years into the future What will be the fate of these 4th Generation planes India is buying (some at their tail end of technology today)
    It’s best we go for the teeth end of technology and purchase the fifth generation F35
    Stealth and superior engines and avionics on planes are needed to counter the Iron Dome China will build
    All these planes are vulnerable to the S400 & future S500 Air defense except the superior stealthy F35 not even mentioned here.
    China will supply Pakistan within ten years with stealt and a superior engine plane
    This will penetrate our Air defence. Pakistan my be supplied with its own Chinese Iron Dome
    Future Pakistani long range fast interceptors J20 Fighters will shoot down all of Indias AWACS before using PAF F16 fighters to attack our old antique Air Force.
    The long range fast J20 stealth will be used to attack our blind Aircraft carriers which are sitting ducks.
    The 100 fourth generation fighters India is buying, when war starts may be playing blind mans bluff all over Indian skies against the enemy fifth generation.
    The long range J20 can also interfere with Indian Air to Air refuelling, how are our own planes to cross Tibet and attack the heart lands of China? Many J20 will be stationed out of range of attack from Indias 4th generation.

  4. I had great advise but my comment would not be accepted and so I am not writing.



Recent Posts

Page 1 of 10412345...104Next >>Last