Pipavav warship joint venture put on hold - Broadsword by Ajai Shukla - Strategy. Economics. Defence.

Home Top Ad


Tuesday 27 September 2011

Pipavav warship joint venture put on hold

The dry dock in Pipavav Shipyard. Nikhil Gandhi, Pipavav chief, regrets that the MoD has cancelled MDL's JV with Pipavav. Says Gandhi: "We have invested a billion dollars in building the required infrastructure and not waited for orders first to build capacity.”

by Ajai Shukla
Business Standard, 27th Sept 11

The ministry of defence (MoD) on Monday sent a clear signal that private Indian defence shipyards are to be treated as serious partners in building warships for the Indian Navy.

Responding to written complaints from three private shipbuilders about the allegedly improper selection by government-owned Mazagon Dock Ltd (MDL), Mumbai, of Gujarat-based Pipavav Shipyard as its joint venture (JV) partner, the defence minister has struck down MDL’s decision.

The MoD announced that “the ministry had decided to put on hold the JV of MDL till a policy on JVs is put in place by the government... Antony (defence minister) said the ministry would study the complaints received from some private shipyards regarding the JV. The issue needs to be fully examined and settled before any forward movement takes place on this front. He also said that JVs must compete for contracts and not get them on nomination basis. Shri Antony said we are treading on a new path and we would like to ensure that transparency is maintained at all levels.”

In an apparently stinging reproof to MDL, the public sector shipyard was not informed of this decision till the time of going to press. Antony’s comments were made while addressing the parliamentary consultative committee for defence here on Monday.

Asked for his comments, vice-admiral (retired) H S Malhi, the chairman of MDL, told Business Standard, “The MoD has not yet informed us of this decision. I am hearing of it through this press release. We have no comments to offer.”

Pipavav Shipyard chairman Nikhil Gandhi, in Paris at present, said: “It’s a very sad and disturbing day. But I am sure I will stand vindicated, as we were selected after a transparent process which went on for eight months. We have invested a billion dollars in building the required infrastructure and not waited for orders first to build capacity.”

In contrast, there was jubilation amongst the three private sector shipyards — Larsen & Toubro, ABG Shipyards and Bharati Shipyard — that had protested about MDL’s “hasty” decision to form a JV with Pipavav. L&T chairman A M Naik told Business Standard, “The MoD has taken an appropriate decision. The entire process (of selecting a JV partner) had been rushed through without a transparent evaluation process. Now, we hope there will be a proper evaluation, based on a points system, awarded for each shipyard’s infrastructure, capability, board structure and ownership structure.”

Naik says with 32 per cent of his company held by financial institutions, and the government being his largest shareholder, L&T is as much a government-owned company as a private sector one.

The controversy began when the MDL board, on September 9, decided that Pipavav was the private company with which MDL would form a JV for warship building. Even before the MoD could approve the decision, Pipavav made a public announcement, triggering a fierce counter-attack by L&T, ABG and Bharati.

At the root of this controversy is the question of which shipyards will get the lucrative contracts to build the navy’s requirement of tens of major capital warships in the coming years. The navy’s requirements, which remain classified, are spelt out in the Maritime Capability Perspective Plan 2012-2027. MDL enjoys a premium position as the only shipyard with the capability, capacity and experience of building even the destroyer class of heavy warships (over 7,500 tonnes). However, located as it is in congested Mumbai, MDL has a space constraint that places limits on the number it can build.

Therefore, earlier this year, it set out to identify a private sector shipyard as a JV partner. That aim was to marry MDL’s expertise and experience with the private shipyard’s capacity.

After MDL issued an Expression of Interest (EoI) on March 11 to several private shipyards, four were shortlisted: L&T, ABG, Pipavav; and Bharati. According to executives from these shipyards, they made presentations to the MDL board on August 23, outlining their respective visions of the proposed collaboration. Based on those presentations, MDL sent a letter on August 25 for details of the business plan for the JV. Before any shipyard could reply, the MDL board chose Pipavav as their partner, on September 9.

Sources within the MoD say the process of selection would now be started afresh, with clearly defined parameters once the JV policy was in place.

(With additional reporting by Arijit Burman)


  1. MDL should go ahead with the joint venture with pipavav to build destroyers,frigates and diesal electric submarines. L&T should be in a joint venture with HSL to build India's future SSN& SSBN and the vishakapatnam shipyard building and the GRSE should choose among the remaing private shipyards and by these joint ventures the navy's requirement for ships, submarines and aircraft carriers will be met in a timely manner. But this is just my opinion but only time will tell

  2. Whatever they do, they need to be on a faster track with internal transparency. At least the quality and quantities of our shipyards are increasing.

  3. @Mr.Ra
    Faster and transparency often dont go hand in hand sadly
    transparency involves multiple levels of verification...and a laid down policy before that....

  4. Multiple levels of verification may be justified, but what about other factors. Even the Multiple levels of verification can be covered within minimum possible period with effective management and internal transparency for the sake of the nation, if there is a will.

  5. L & T does not even have its shipyard ready. It is playing a sore looser after not being selected by MDL. Pipavav has far superior infrastructure all-round and even after L & T's facilities in kattupalli are up they will be no match for Pipavav's mega-block build strategy to speed delivery time for ships.

    L & T has a rich history of playing spoilsport, it dragged the MoD to court (and lost twice)after being disqualified for Offshore Patrol Vessels which was won eventually by Cochin Shipyard.

    In other industries too L & T plays the same game, dragging NTPC to court after being disqualified.

    Mr. Naik thinks by virtue of being L & T they should be given everything on the platter.

    L & T is not god's gift to India.

  6. MDL is by far the best shipyard in india. Rest all are below par. As for HSL,it's a white elephant that navy has been forced to feed by MOD.One EKM submarine that has gone in there is still there after 5 years as reported.These guys are builders of merchant vessels and not warships and certainly not submarines. HSL takes orders and then raises its hand and says we cannot complete it. It is then left to the naval dockyard to finish the job while HSL tomtoms this as its "grand success" in all newspapers.Since it's a PSU,it can manipulate media well while navy cannot. The facilities HSL provides to the navy is pathetic.They just eat money and do nothing.

    Anon@27 Sep 13:27....
    The thought of HSL constructing an SSBN or SSN is downright scary.Let them first construct a small warship on their own steam.....They will construct an SSN,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,after 1000 years yes


Recent Posts

Page 1 of 10412345...104Next >>Last