At $43 million each, the Tejas Mark 1A competes in export market - Broadsword by Ajai Shukla - Strategy. Economics. Defence.

Home Top Ad

Breaking

Sunday 17 January 2021

At $43 million each, the Tejas Mark 1A competes in export market

The Tejas Mk 1A costs more than the JF-17 Thunder, but with its AESA radar and EW suite, is a superior fighter 


By Ajai Shukla

 

On Wednesday, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) announced the Union Cabinet’s clearance for Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) to build 83 Tejas Mark 1A light combat aircraft (LCA) for Rs 45,696 crore. This raised concerns that the improved version of the current Tejas Mark 1 fighter would cost a daunting Rs 550 crore each.

 

However, senior government sources have clarified to Business Standard that each Tejas Mark 1A will cost no more than Rs 315 crore to build, with the total manufacturing cost adding up to Rs 26,145 crore.

 

The balance of the Cabinet clearance includes allocations for tax and for maintenance and support infrastructure in the two operational air bases that will be home to the four squadrons of the Tejas Mark 1A.

 

Of the Cabinet’s total allocation, government taxes and levies constitute about 20 per cent, or about Rs 9,000 crore. Effectively, the Ministry of Finance will be appropriating a large chunk of the defence budget through taxing an indigenous weapons platform.

 

In major arms manufacturing countries, such as the USA, defence equipment and weaponry is exempt from excise and sales tax.

 

True, taxation of defence equipment merely amounts to money going from one government pocket to another. However, it would have serious implications when it comes to export of the Tejas Mark 1A. The government has emphasised the need for promoting export, which would reduce the fighter’s cost through manufacture in larger numbers.

 

At Rs 315 crore ($43 million) per fighter, the Tejas Mark 1A would be a viable competitor in the international market for light fighters. It would be less so if taxes took up its cost to Rs 378 crore ($51 million). Competitors, such as the Sino-Pakistan JF-17 Thunder, are cheaper with a unit cost of $25-30 million. However, the Tejas Mark 1A outperforms them in avionics and weaponry.

 

This is through performance enhancements introduced into the Tejas Mark 1A, compared to the current Mark 1. The Mark 1A features the Israeli Elta EL/AESA 2052 active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar, replacing the Mark 1’s manually scanned Elta EL/M 2032 radar. None of the light fighters competing with the Tejas features an AESA radar, which provides a massive advantage in air-to-air as well as air-to-ground combat.

 

The Tejas Mark 1A also scores in electronic warfare (EW), being equipped with an Israeli self-protection jammer (SPJ), carried in an external pod under the fighter’s wing. 

 

Finally, an operational edge is provided by the Mark 1A’s air-to-air missiles. Its primary “beyond visual range” (BVR) missile is the indigenous Astra, one of the Defence R&D Organisation’s (DRDO’s) outstanding successes. In addition, the Mark 1A is integrated with the shorter-range ASRAAM missile, built by European consortium, MBDA; and with the Israeli Derby and Russian R-73 missiles.

 

While the Tejas LCA programme has been run by the DRDO, through an organisation called the Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA), developing and manufacturing the Tejas Mark 1A was entrusted to HAL. However, ADA, which holds all the source codes of the Tejas, charged HAL a sum of Rs 800 crore for its partnership.

 

The amount cleared by the Cabinet also includes expenditure on setting up operational infrastructure for flying the Tejas Mark 1A from two Indian Air Force (IAF) bases, which are still unidentified. Each airbase will house two Tejas Mark 1A squadrons.

 

Each of these two airbases will operate a Technical Training School, in which maintenance technicians and even pilots will undergo continuous training and upgrading of their technical skills. The cost of setting up each of these training establishments will be over Rs 300 crore.

 

An expenditure of Rs 1,202 crore has also been budgeted for setting up “ground support equipment” (GSE) and “ground handling equipment” (GHE) in both the Tejas Mark 1A airbases. This equipment is required for the ground end of flying operations – getting the fighter aircraft started up and airborne, carrying out maintenance checks and a certain level of repair and replacement of modules.

 

A large sum has been cleared for the Tejas Mark 1A’s “maintenance running list of spares” (MRLS), which is a large inventory of spares and modules that operational squadrons and depots holds in reserve. This is so that, in the event of an aircraft component or module requiring to be replaced, it is readily available with the airbase and there is no waiting period while the part is obtained from a central depot.

 

IAF sources indicate that HAL initially submitted a cost estimate of Rs 59,000 crore, which was brought down by the Cost Negotiation Committee by Rs 12,000 crore. In fact, the reason for HAL’s high initial estimate was the IAF’s demand that the Tejas fighter’s engine – the F-404IN engine, built by US firm General Electric (GE) – be manufactured in India with transfer of technology (ToT) from GE.

 

Eventually, this plan was dropped due to the high cost demanded by GE for ToT and licence to build the F-404IN engine in India. Buying ready-built engines from GE brought down the project cost by Rs 12,000 crore.

 

 

Graphic:  Tejas cost breakdown

 

1.     Basic cost of 83 fighters                      :           Rs 26,145 crore

2.     ADA consultancy charges                   :           Rs 800 crore

3.     Maintenance running list of spares    :           Rs 8,000 crore

4.     Technical training schools                  :           Rs 600 crore

5.     GSE/GHE                                             :           Rs 1,202 crore

6.     Central taxes                                       :           Rs 9,000 crore

TOTAL (about)                                    :           Rs 45,696 crore


2 comments:

  1. Basics of GST. Exports are zero rated, ie it's a supply without payment of any duty. This is for all exports not just for LCA.

    Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  2. # ....."India’s total iron and steel exports in the first five months of fiscal 2020-21, [viz apr to aug, 2020] to China were more than three times the figure in the entire financial year 2019-20. Data from the Ministry of Commerce and Industry shows that the total iron and steel exports to China were worth $1.86 billion in April-August 2020, up from $514 million for all of 2019-20.This has meant that while relations between India and China have hit a new low thanks to the border standoff in Ladakh, China’s share in India’s export and import baskets has increased this fiscal." ...."Indian cotton is being offered at around 74 cents per lb, cost and freight-basis, to buyers in China, Bangladesh and Vietnam for November shipment, versus more than 77 cents from Brazil and the United Sates, dealers with global trading firms said. Most of the shipments are heading towards China and Bangladesh, said Arun Sekhsaria, managing director of exporter D.D. Cotton.....surely we are not going to compromise our supply of iron and steel, raw cotton to CHINA. both are primary products, raw materials, so that china can use them in manufacturing, value addition, MAKE IN CHINA. or are we going to take back aksai chin, liberate tibet, interdict chinese shipping transiting the malacca straits, and throttle china's ambitions, expansionism, belligerence. each day, night must be sheer torture for our thousands of indian army jawans, bravehearts deployed to eastern ladakh at exreme high altitude that even ladakhis and tibetans avoid by moving to lower altitudes before winter, compounding the subzero cold of ladakhi winter in that region's higher reaches. and as any physician can confirm, every 24 hours spent at that altitude, in extreme sub zero temperatures, with the howling wind compounding the normal wind-chill factor will translate into a significantly reduced life-span besides serious complications as the years go by, post discharge on pension. maybe we can sacrifice 18 out of the 83 aircraft and invest the 10,000 crores on special facilities for those jawans who will in the fullness of time, sadly eventually develop complications attributable to the stresses of this tour of duty. that is besides boycotting smart phone apps and video games of chinese origin such as tik-tok, clash of kings. after all china is not known as a software super-power, india is! of course we could build a few fighters to trundle out for the republic day procession, and for the fly-past besides as replacements for those that will be pranged during training, routine sorties, logging up of required flying hours to keep our air-warriors combat ready.

    ReplyDelete

Recent Posts

<
Page 1 of 10412345...104Next >>Last