US and Indian artillery guns compete for longer ranges - Broadsword by Ajai Shukla - Strategy. Economics. Defence.

Home Top Ad


Sunday 21 October 2018

US and Indian artillery guns compete for longer ranges

The Indian 155-millimetre ATAGS gun being test fired to a range of 47 kilometres last year

By Ajai Shukla
Business Standard, 21st Oct 18

Last September, the Kalyani Group and Tata Power (Strategic Engineering Division) claimed world records by firing their in-development artillery guns to a distance of over 47 kilometres. Their Advanced Towed Artillery Gun System (ATAGS) comfortably surpassed the maximum ranges of 40-45 kilometres currently achieved by similar 155-millimetre, 52-calibre guns in service worldwide.

However, a new American artillery gun is comfortably surpassing ATAGS. Also known by an acronym, the Extended Range Cannon Artillery (ERCA) has achieved a mind-boggling range of 62 kilometres. That doubles the range of the gun the ERCA is based on – the M777 ultra-light towed howitzer that will soon enter service with the Indian Army.

“We just doubled the range of our artillery at Yuma Proving Ground,” General John Murray, who heads the Army Futures Command, stated at the recent Association of the United States Army Annual Symposium, according to Fox News.

Artillery guns are judged by three attributes: range, accuracy and consistency. Longer range allows guns to fire from “standoff ranges”, beyond the reach of enemy artillery. That is like a boxer with very long arms, pummelling an opponent whose shorter arms cannot reach one’s chin.

Artillery guns with longer range can also engage larger areas from a “gun position”, reducing the need to keep redeploying (or shifting) gun positions as the battle lines shift.

“The Russian and Chinese have been able to outrange most of our systems,” Murray said. Now the ERCA is aimed at “regaining tactical overmatch”, or outranging the adversaries’ artillery.

Interestingly, both the Indian ATAGS and the American ERCA are following broadly the same approach towards extending range. Both are using larger propellant charges to fire the warhead a longer distance. Simultaneously, both are incorporating longer barrels – a time tested way to increase range.

The ATAGS incorporates a 25-litre chamber, which holds more propellant that the 23-litre chambers in most contemporary 155-millimetre guns, such as the French Nexter and Israeli Elbit guns the Indian army has evaluated. The extra two litres of high explosive propellant shoots out the warhead further.

Like the ATAGS, the ERCA’s larger chamber allows for larger propellant charges. According to public statements from the US Army Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center, they have for the first time used “Zone 6” propellant, which is more voluminous than the “Zone 5” top charge they ever fired earlier.

In addition, the ERCA’s developers extended its barrel length by six feet. Along with the larger chamber, this is said to have extended the gun’s range by several kilometres.

The challenge in making such enhancements is to strengthen the gun to absorb the higher “shock of firing”, without making the gun unacceptably heavy. The ATAGS has had mixed results: It weighs about 17 tonnes, while comparable guns worldwide weigh about 14-15 tonnes. In contrast, the ERCA’s enhancements have increased its weight by just 500 kilogrammes.

While the ATAGS’ higher weight makes the gun less mobile, the army acknowledges that it has also brought several major advantages. It is the world’s first gun with an “all-electric drive” that replacesl the relatively unreliable hydraulic drives traditionally fitted in towed guns. 

The ATAGS’ all-electric drive operates all its gun controls, ammunition handling, opening and closing the breech, and ramming the round into the chamber. This makes firing faster and easier.

In addition, the ATAGS has a six-round “automated magazine” – another global first – that fires a six-round burst in just 30 seconds. Most other existing 155-millimetre, 52-calibre guns in service have three-round magazines. A six-round burst causes more enemy casualties, since all those rounds come down in quick succession, catching soldiers in the open before they can take shelter in their trenches or bunkers.

Reflecting official confidence in the ATAGS, the two prototypes were paraded on Republic Day in New Delhi this year. 

After development and firing trials are successfully concluded, the army is likely to procure at least 2,000 ATAGS to make up a serious shortage of artillery. At an estimated Rs 15-20 crore apiece, that will result in Rs 30,000-40,000 crore worth of business for Indian defence industry, including for many private defence firms.


  1. What is the point of having towed guns, that are basically static, when there are weapon locating radars available with most enemies? These guns should be mobile!

  2. Both the system falls in same class ?? Range of ERCA , apart from modification in barrel length , breach and metallurgy of the tube , is due to rocket assisted projectile and new super charge. So can we really compare ECRA based on M777 with ATAGS , the later being a more proven system till date. This line artilcles and arguments only lead to our indigenous system being sidelined for imported system.


  3. The US army is an expeditionary one. They need to travel light have accurate firepower.
    The US defence Budget is more than rest of top 12 to 15 countries spend.

    What we need is 155 mm artillery backed up by MRLS , 1000s of them, this is more cost effective.
    This need has been around from kargil times, but getting ordered only now by Modi Govt.

    See the nice article written by Sandeep for India today.
    If we can get a few100 surplus 130 mm from east Europe would be good idea to buy and upgrade (or use as spares) as an emergency measure ?
    (See IAF buying surplus jaguars )

    This article lacks basic military and economic sense.


Recent Posts

Page 1 of 10412345...104Next >>Last