Like all its predecessors, INS Kiltan joins navy fleet with major vulnerabilities - Broadsword by Ajai Shukla - Strategy. Economics. Defence.

Home Top Ad

Breaking

Monday, 16 October 2017

Like all its predecessors, INS Kiltan joins navy fleet with major vulnerabilities

It doesn’t have towed array sonar, essential for detecting enemy submarines in the shallow Arabian Sea

By Ajai Shukla
Business Standard, 17th Oct 17

Like numerous Indian warships before it, the navy’s newest anti-submarine warfare (ASW) corvette, INS Kiltan, joined the fleet on Monday without equipment crucial for discharging its primary role – detecting and destroying enemy submarines.

The Kiltan, like two predecessor ASW corvettes, INS Kamorta and INS Kadmatt, was commissioned by Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman in Visakhapatnam without “advanced towed array sonar” (ATAS), essential for detecting enemy submarines in the shallow Arabian Sea where the peculiar temperature and salinity gradients sharply limit the effectiveness of conventional sonars.

Without ATAS, enemy submarines can sneak undetected to within 50-80 kilometres of Indian warships and destroy them with heavy torpedoes from standoff ranges.

The Kiltan will also make do without another vital ASW platform – a naval multi-role helicopter (NMRH), which flies low over the sea, lowering “dunking sonar” into the water, listening for audio signals from enemy submarines. The navy is left with just a handful of NMRH choppers – 12 Sea Kings, of which no more than six are usually operational at any time; and eight Kamov-28, of which four-six are available. The navy must distribute these 10-12 helicopters between some 35 capital warships.

“An ASW corvette without towed array sonar and an ASW helicopter, is nothing more than a feeble joke”, says a retired navy commodore with decades of ASW experience.

Yet, neither of the two Indian warships that called on the Japanese port of Sasebo last week – the frigate INS Satpura and ASW corvette, INS Kadmatt – has towed array sonar. While passing through the South China Sea, these warships would have been at the mercy of Chinese submarines.

In June, the defence ministry scrapped an NMRH purchase that had been initiated in 2009 and was at the point of conclusion. Instead, returning to the start line, the navy has now re-initiated fresh procurement for 123 NMRH.

After this newspaper reported that every Indian warship built after 1997 lacked towed array sonar (“Warships in peril as defence ministry blocks sonar purchase”, May 16, 2014), the defence ministry contracted for six ATAS systems from German naval systems giant, Atlas Elektronik, for just under Euro 40 million (Rs 306 crore).

Those six ATAS systems were earmarked for the navy’s three Talwar-class frigates (INS Talwar, Trishul and Tabar) and three Delhi-class destroyers (INS Delhi, Mumbai and Mysore). In effect, a Rs 50 crore ATAS multiplied the survival chances of warships worth several thousand crore apiece, each crewed by hundreds of sailors.

Yet, the National Democratic Alliance government has gone slow on a follow-on proposal to build ten more ATAS systems at Bharat Electronics Ltd (BEL), in partnership with Atlas Elektronik. Those ten systems are intended for three Shivalik-class frigates (INS Shivalik, Satpura and Sahyadri); three Project 15A destroyers (INS Kolkata, Kochi and Chennai) and four Project 28 ASW corvettes, the third of which was commissioned today.

Without ATAS, India’s frontline capital warships, including the aircraft carrier, INS Vikramaditya, rely on a relatively ineffective Passive Towed Array Sonar (PTAS), and an indigenous hull-mounted sonar called HUMSA to detect enemy submarines.

Perhaps oblivious to all this, Sitharaman stated today while commissioning Kiltan that: “[T]he government fully appreciates the nation’s defence requirements and requisite finances… would be made available for the modernisation and development plans of the Navy”, according to a defence ministry release.

INS Kiltan’s keel was laid in Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers, Kolkata (GRSE) in August 2010 and she was launched in March 2013. She has been undergoing sea trials since May, and has taken more than seven years in construction.

The corvette, manned by 13 officers and 178 sailors, is propelled by a combination of four Wartsila diesel engines to achieve a cruising speed of 25 knots. She has an endurance of 3,500 nautical miles.

In a significant departure from her predecessors, INS Kamorta and Kadmatt, INS Kiltan is India’s first major warship with an all-composite superstructure. This has made the vessel lighter by about 100 tonnes.

Her weapons package includes heavy weight torpedoes, ASW rockets, an Otomelara 76 millimetre anti-aircraft gun and two multi-barrel 30 mm AK-630 guns for close-in protection against enemy aircraft.

The corvette, in naval tradition, inherits her name from a previous INS Kiltan (numbered P 79), a Soviet-supplied Petya-class ASW vessel that served in the fleet for 18 years before she was decommissioned in June 1987.


The four Project 28 corvettes are all named after islands in the Andaman & Nicobar chain in the Bay of Bengal, and the Lakshadweep archipelago in the Arabian Sea.

3 comments:

  1. AT OVER 3000 CRORES PER SHIP , IT IS OPEN LOOT BY ENTRENCHED NETAS BABUS BUSINESSMEN, SHIPYARD AND UNIFORM RANKS .DEFENCE PSUS AND SUPPLIERS OF EQUIPMENT . THE VERY ADAVATAGE OF CHEAP LABOUR ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS IS OFFSET BY PLUNDERING RATES AND DELAY IN CONSTRUCTION . ASHIP WHICH SHOULD COMPLETE IN 18 MONTHS TAKES 7 YEARS MAKING LABOUR RATES SHOOT UP 7 TIMES AND COST WHICH SHOULD NOT BE MORE THAN 350 CRORES TO OVER 300 CRORES . THE NAVY WHICH REQUIRES OVER 40 OF THESE ASW SHIPS IS THEN HANDICAPPED IN BUYING ONLY LESS THAN 6.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True.... Everyone is getting overtime...defence PSU ppl getting regular salary. No initiative to improve productivity..

      But loot is there in every country...the US companies charge a bomb for the same stuff...but at least their stuff works!!

      Delete
  2. True.
    But this way everyone is happy.

    DPSU workers get paid the same. Will GRSE pay them double if their work is twice as efficient?
    Can they deduct salary if their workers are slow?

    Sarkari organisations won't improve!

    Privatization is the only solution.

    Or have a communist organisation...that inefficient workers are thrown out without pension.
    Project managers are jailed or executed.

    Can't happen in India.

    Just too bad!!

    ReplyDelete

Recent Posts

<
Page 1 of 10412345...104Next >>Last