Govt gives ordnance factories free pass in combat vehicle project - Broadsword by Ajai Shukla - Strategy. Economics. Defence.

Home Top Ad


Friday 15 January 2016

Govt gives ordnance factories free pass in combat vehicle project

By Ajai Shukla
Business Standard, 16th Jan 16

In an undisguised favour to the Ordnance Factory Board (OFB), the defence ministry announced on Thursday that, while nine private sector companies would compete to develop the future infantry combat vehicle (FICV), the OFB would be nominated without competing as a third development agency. The FICV project is worth an estimated Rs 50,000 crore.

The ministry’s Expression of Interest (EoI), which invited ten companies on July 16, 2015 to submit proposals to develop the FICV under the “Make” procedure, specified that two development agencies would be chosen. Now, even as that competitive selection continues, the OFB has been given a free pass.

“Competent Authority has approved the deviation to DPP-2008 for ‘Nomination of OFB and two Indian Private Sector Industries to undertake design and development of FICV prototypes (sic)”, said a defence ministry circular on Thursday. Business Standard has reviewed the circular.

Ministry insiders say this last-minute decision was taken because it was evident the OFB would not be selected in a fair competitive process. To ensure the OFB participates, the rules of the game have been unprecedentedly changed in the middle of the game.

The decision came just a day before the ten contestants were to submit their responses to the EOI. The ministry circular stated: “In view of the above decision, the date of submission of response to the EOI has been extended and now the EOI response [may] be submitted by (noon) on 15 Feb 2016”.

Private company executives who have priced their FICV bids say each company will spend about Rs 1,000 crore in developing the prototype FICV, of which 80 per cent will be reimbursed to them according to the “Make” procedure. By nominating the OFB as a third development agency, the defence ministry is increasing the cost of the project by about Rs 800 crore.

This step is likely to evoke strong objections from the nine private companies in the race --- Larsen & Toubro; Tata Power (Strategic Engineering Division); Tata Motors; Mahindra & Mahindra; Bharat Forge; Pipavav Defence; Rolta India; Punj Lloyd and Titagarh Wagons.

The last time the defence ministry attempted to grant similar favour; it was forced to step back. In 2009, it nominated defence public sector unit, Bharat Electronics Ltd (BEL), to build the Tactical Communications System (TCS) under the “Make” procedure. After strong objections from private defence companies, the TCS project was competitively tendered.

Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar has repeatedly promised, most recently in an interview on November 25, that the private and public defence sectors would compete on a level playing field. Private sector executives point to decisions like this to underline the hollowness of this promise.

Under the “Make” procedure, the defence ministry will choose the best two proposals. Those two companies, and the OFB, will design and develop separate FICV prototypes. The defence ministry would reimburse 80 per cent of their expenses. The best prototype will then be selected, and the vendor that built it will get a manufacturing contract. About 2,600 FICVs will be needed to replace the army’s old Russian-origin BMP-2 infantry combat vehicles.


  1. This is bad, bad, bad, and a transparent attempt by the GoI to curry favour with the central unions. The 800 crore waste is bad enough, but the Government will then bend the results to give the contract to the OFB, with the result that the Army will be stuck with the BMP-3 that it has rejected in the past.

    The whole deal stinks...

  2. At last the show begins! Lets hope MOD stays on course for this one. This FICV is greatly important for our Army .

  3. Ajai, does this mean the government agency will get the contract?

  4. OFB's remain in monolithic period...

  5. Aim should have been to create public-private partnership, through linked ancillaries for systems and sub-systems with one lead integrater. In this manner, both OFs and private sector can progress and would also give a 'level playing field'.

  6. The private companies should challenge this decision. Any bidder must win on merit, fair and square.


Recent Posts

Page 1 of 10412345...104Next >>Last