India caught in the crossfire as US Congress squeezes Trump on Russia - Broadsword by Ajai Shukla - Strategy. Economics. Defence.

Home Top Ad


Monday 7 May 2018

India caught in the crossfire as US Congress squeezes Trump on Russia

India’s defence faces collateral damage as the US Congress binds Trump to act against Russia

By Ajai Shukla
Business Standard, 8th May 18

The United States of America (US) has leapt ahead of Russia as India’s biggest supplier of new weaponry. A recent report from Parliament’s Standing Committee on Defence reveals that, during the last three years, US firms concluded 13 contracts with India, worth Rs 288 billion. In the same period, Russia got 12 contracts, valued at just Rs 83 billion – not even one-third of the US bag. Now Moscow’s share could decline further, with New Delhi being squeezed by the threat of US sanctions against countries that buy weaponry from Russia.

These sanctions are embedded in legislation – titled “Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act” (CAATSA) – that the US Congress passed in mid-2017. While CAATSA is directed at Russia, Iran and North Korea, it is the Russian component of the law that most concerns India. It enjoins the US administration to impose sanctions against countries that engage in “significant transactions” with Russian defence and intelligence entities. India is highly vulnerable to that charge, with its military heavily dependent upon the purchase from Russia for spares, maintenance, and overhaul of its roughly 6,000 tanks and infantry combat vehicles, artillery and air defence guns, warships, submarines and large numbers of fighter and transport aircraft and helicopters. It would be no exaggeration to say that without large purchases from Russia, India’s military would grind to a halt. In addition to keeping its legacy fleet running, India is exploring crucial new transactions from Russia, such as the lease of a nuclear submarine, the purchase of 200 Kamov-226 helicopters and the S-400 Triumf advanced air defence systems.

Intriguingly, recent days have seen a resurgence of chatter in the strategic community about the possibility of India being sanctioned under CAATSA. It is speculated that India’s proposed purchase of the S-400 Triumf has caused red lights to start flashing in Washington DC. Like CAATSA itself, the S-400 proposal is not new; the defence ministry cleared it in principle in December 2015 and negotiations have been on-going since then. But Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman’s visit to Moscow last month and Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Monday meeting with President Vladimir Putin has heightened anticipation of an imminent contract. Washington insiders say that top US administration officials might be willing to condone procurements like Kamov light helicopters, arguing that is not a “significant transaction”. But the S-400 Triumf, which is an upgraded version of the S-300 missile system that China’s military uses, and which is a key preoccupation of US Air Force planners could never be accorded an exemption. Besides, the estimated $4.5 billion value of such a contract could hardly be ignored by Washington.

It is ironical that the US Congress, which is uniformly well disposed towards India, has enacted CAATSA, even though it directly undermines Indian defence capability. In fact, India is mere collateral damage in the operating of CAATSA, which is primarily directed at President Donald Trump. Practically every Democrat in the US Congress, and a large percentage of Republican Russia-hawks, have been furious at Mr Trump’s kid-glove treatment of Russia. Democrats believe Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election robbed Hilary Clinton of the presidency; meanwhile Republican orthodoxy can hardly countenance Mr Trump’s chumminess towards Mr Putin and his thuggish administration. With the common objective of forcing Mr Trump to confront Moscow, lawmakers from both sides of the aisle in the US Congress passed CAATSA. In this single-minded focus on binding Mr Trump to an anti-Russia course of action, the collateral damage being inflicted on national security allies has been disregarded.

Mr Trump could have sent CAATSA back to Congress, but he realised that, given his perceived closeness to Mr Putin, not signing off on it would only make things look worse. Besides, so overwhelming was the support in Congress for CAATSA that it might well have reappeared before Mr Trump in veto-proof form, backed by a two-thirds Congressional majority. So, while signing off on CAATSA on August 2, 2017, Mr Trump did what a number of US presidents have done over the last 30 years when signing legislation they had grave reservations about. He issued a “signing statement”, that said the bill was “seriously flawed – particularly because it encroaches on the executive branch’s authority to negotiate”. Stating that he was signing CAATSA for the sake of “national unity”, Mr Trump’s statement ended with characteristic flourish: “I built a truly great company worth many billions of dollars. That is a big part of the reason I was elected. As President, I can make far better deals with foreign countries than Congress”.

Realising CAATSA’s potential for damaging relations with key partners like India, Secretary of Defence James Mattis has been campaigning for a national security waiver from CAATSA for key allies, including in recent testimony before the US Congress. However, Democratic Congresspersons are virulently opposed to any waiver that might allow Mr Trump’s administration to bypass CAATSA. The Republicans might be more open to the notion of a waiver for a small handful of countries, but they do not want to give Mr Trump a free hand on Russia either.

Complicating matters is the fact that the administration itself is divided on the issue of a CAATSA waiver. There are administration officials who still bear a grudge against India, believing that Washington had conceded too much to New Delhi in the US-India nuclear deal. Mr Mattis is clearly on India’s side, but he is the only adult in the room for most administration confabulations. National Security Advisor John Bolton and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo would have to be brought onto the same page, but they have both been in office for just days and have not revealed where they stand. Neither is a known friend of India.

The Indian Embassy in Washington has made sporadic efforts to reach out to individual Congresspersons for supporting a CAATSA waiver. However, Indian diplomats in Washington have not been great at “working the Hill”. They have relied instead on powerful allies — like Jim Mattis today — hoping they would fight the battle for India. 

Perhaps to reduce the likelihood of sanctions, there have been noticeable efforts by New Delhi to downplay the Indo-Russia defence relationship. In February, India terminated its participation in the high-profile proposal to develop an Indo-Russian fifth generation fighter. During Defexpo 2018 last month, Ms Sitharaman noticeably cold-shouldered the Russian delegation. There are clear limits to how much, and how quickly, India can decrease its dependence upon Russian arms supplies, something that many US officials in Washington do not quite comprehend. But for now, it would appear that American officials are taking solace from the decreasing Indian purchases from Russia – evident from the Standing Committee report – a trend that US officials could use to justify waiving sanctions on India. 


  1. I'd dare say that CAATSA has become a convenient excuse for India's security establishment to further pare back on Russian defence purchases. India has not made a platform buy since the 42 CKDs for Su-30 MKI in 2012. And that was long before CAATSA was conceived. Yet, CAATSA is a good wake up call for India to always keep its national security policy ring fenced from domestic upheavals in US and the Americans themselves at an arms length. Expect this to be another storm in the tea-cup (or cup-of-joe as the Americans prefer). Else, I'd watch how long India keeps participating in Malabar exercises; an obvious casualty one can expect should the US press ahead with sanctioning India! Meanwhile, the upshot of sanctions is often increased self-reliance; and that is not a bad thing at all!!

  2. The US is an unpredictable security partner, subject to the whims of the day. Time for Mr Modi to stop the public bromance with Trump and settle down to a more balanced approach. The old policy of non alignment was a good one; even when we were a much poorer and weaker nation we kept our autonomy of decision making. If we have any self respect we will go ahead with the S-400 purchase regardless of CAATSA. The US will hopefully have little difficulty realizing where it’s interests lie....but if they want to shoot themselves in the foot then so be it.

  3. The world police force of US should dictate terms if they are in a position to support the way Russia does. US did not even respond to the FRCV or 75(I) RFIs. And they don't have a missile system as capable as S400. So how can they tell India not to buy it.
    The actual truth is that if CAATSA is implemented, US has more to lose than India.

  4. Indian govt. Needs to seriously wake up and start putting India first. US will back stab us the same way they backstabbed pakis. That too in just less than a few years. The more equipment we buy from them, more vulnerable we are in case of real testing times.

    We need to understand and realise that Russia has always stood with us.

    It's high time we start to make a real attempt defence equipment ourselves.

    All this hogwash of make in india propaganda has to go...and something serious has to happen....else we are digging our own grave!!

  5. In contrast to pessimists, US Congress will respond by granting the waiver required for CAATSA to accommodate India's relationship with Russia. CAATSA was drafted, as the author says, without consideration of India. This extraordinary step would be a very clear sign of US prioritization of India. S400 is not about money. For the US, Russia is a belligerant. This is a litmus test of US ability to transcend domestic politics.

  6. Sitharaman visited the Russian delegation at Defexpo. Multiple pictures to the effect. So can you let us know why you are running a propaganda news campaign?

  7. If I may be permitted to respond to some of the comments.

    (1) Anon is right, an exception will be made for India
    (2) No one has any idea how S400 will work out.
    (3) For the $1-billion/battery that I believe we are paying for S400, we could buy US THAAD, which I'm willing to bet is a much more advanced system than S400
    (4) Are we never going to learn that when Russia offers us a cut-rate deal they make it up by shafting us for years and years.
    (5) Please let the IAF speak the truth on the SU-30. I leave it to our many and esteemed investigative journalists to find the details, it is not my place to speak.
    (6) Lets be truthful with ourselves: would we have accepted US tenders for frigates and destroyers.

    I agree we should not depend on others for weapons. But we've blown it for 50-years, IA/IAF are sitting on the largest junk heap in the world, so what do we do now? (China is rapidly replacing obsolete equipment, they used to have the biggest junk heap)


Recent Posts

Page 1 of 10412345...104Next >>Last